Skip to main content

The Tragedy of Lesbian Romance

 

    Lookup a list ranking lesbian films and you'll likely notice a weird trend. Some lists seem intent on specifying whether or not the two leads die, whether they actually get a happy ending. I would even argue that on those list of "100 best lesbian films" a solid 1/3 is all about sex and sexualizing lesbian women. None of these lists ever really mention whether they end up together or break up. The trend these days tends to be a bit more optimistic but it took a lot of time to actually get to that point. The only movie I can think of off the top of my head that doesn't follow is "But, I'm a Cheerleader" and even then that story isn't a romance but a coming of age film.

Where's the cheesy lesbian Love, Simon? or the deep and thought-provoking lesbian Moonlight? Where's the wild and out-of-control lesbian I love you, Philip Morris?


Why do lesbians' love stories have to end in a break-up, in death, in close-ups of sweaty breasts that the male director thought was necessary?

I think one part of this problem is the fear of a woman not needing a man. Even in the very openly gay worlds of ancient Greece and Rome lesbians were considered taboo for this express reason. Women need a man but a man doesn't need a woman. Lesbians by their very nature cannot follow this line of thinking. I think the idea of an independent woman only works in broader society if a man is still in her life. Think of the classic "working girl" stereotype of the '80s, she's a bit cold and bossy but her life is dedicated to working until she meets a man who makes her rethink that (or in some cases it's a comedy and the man is one who stays at home and takes care of the kids, in that case, the working girl never goes beyond her cold exterior). Female independence comes with some stipulations that we have barely gotten over.

Now many women are arguing they don't need a man but the expectation is that one day, after they have had their fun, they will marry a man but they won't have to give up their dreams to do it. 

But lesbians? They will never find a man to marry, at least by definition. They are the epitome of the early 2000's feminism of "we don't need a man a man needs me".


That's not even to talk about how white lesbian films are, nearly every film on the lists I looked at was of white or half-white relationships. Gay romance hasn't gotten much farther from this hole either. Is it just a matter of time? or will this fear hold mainstream lesbian romance back for way longer than it has held back gay romace?

Comments

  1. You bring up some great questions. It is unfortunate that lesbian films are overly sexualized. In general, I feel that a lot of men and movies fetishize lesbians while not considering lesbian relationships as a real legitimate thing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really like your blog post! I never really thought about how lesbian relationships are portrayed, but now that you've talked about it, the lesbian narratives are very limited. The whole notion that women need to end up marrying a man is absolutely absurd, and I really hope there will be movies about women that don't end up living their societal expectation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think things will likely take time to progress. It is very important to realize that the fetishization of lesbians is not equivalent to equality or positive change. A lot of lesbian films do fetishize them and this is likely due to a lot of straight men fetishizing lesbian women. At least that's just part of it of course. I'm on the same boat for sure though, there needs to be an improvement on the depictions of lesbian romance in film and more representation of non-white LGBT romance. It will likely take time.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Alike, Isolation, and Queer Choice

 One of the things I felt the hardest when watching Pariah was the feeling of isolation Alike had throughout the film. I think that's one of the biggest hallmarks of being young and queer, this feeling that no one can possibly know what it is you're going through. The desperation to have your family understand you.  I adored how Dee Rees uses the frame-within-a-frame technique throughout the film to show this feeling. Nothing feels more isolating than being in public, surrounded by people, and knowing none of them can really see you. Rees uses this most often when Alike is around her family because those are the people who are supposed to understand her and she knows they don't. Her father is the closest to really know her and there are several scenes where she realizes he doesn't. Even Laura and Bina can't seem to fully understand what she is dealing with at home and within herself. I think that's there's always a sense of helplessness at being queer'd....

Pelo Malo and Hollywood's queer pain problem

     I really loved Pelo Malo  mostly because of how different the queer narrative is compared to the American (and subsequently white) queer narratives present in media.     In most white American queer films the pain comes either from a character's struggle to come out (like Love, Simon ) or how for whatever reason the two leads can't be together ( Brokeback Mountian ). The possibility of actual injury or death should the characters' queerness be exposed isn't really the focus (or it isn't present at all), the worst that can happen is a bully makes fun of them or their families get mad. Abandonment is also there as a possibility but it isn't often explored. Queer pain often feels more like shallow window dressing, not something that's really given meaningful observation or study. These films feel like queer stories written for straight audiences by straight writers (which is weird to me because Love, Simon  is the only film, as far as I know, on this...